A16596:216
A double summons the one, to unfeigned repentance. The other, to the worthy receiving…A double summons the one, to vnfained repentance. The other, to the worthie receiuing…
A double summons the one, to unfeigned repentance. The other, to the worthy receiving of the Lords Supper. Delivered in two notable sermons: made, by that worthy martyr of Christ, John Bradford: who suffered in Smith-field An[n]o. Domini. 1555.A double summons the one, to vnfained repentance. The other, to the worthie receiuing of the Lords Supper. Deliuered in two notable sermons: made, by that worthy martyr of Christ, Iohn Bradford: who suffered in Smith-field An[n]o. Domini. 1555.
London: printed by George Purslowe, 1617
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Therefore, Woe unto them that preach not.
Therefore, Woe vnto them that preach not.
There be two evils about the Sacraments, which to avoid, the holy Ghost hath taught us. For least we should with the Papists, think Christs body present in, or with the bread really, naturally, and corporally, to be received with our bodily mouth (where ⟨p. 113⟩there is no other presence of Christs body then spiritual, and to the faith) in many places he keepeth still the name of bread, as in the Epistle to the Corinthians, the tenth and eleventh Chapters. And least we should make to light of it, making it but a bare sign and no better then common bread, the holy Ghost calleth it Christs body; whose speech I wish we would follow and that not only as well to avoid the evil, which is now a days most to be feared, concerning the Sacrament, I mean, of contemning it: as also for that no faithful man cometh to the Sacrament to receive bread simply, but rather, yea, altogether to communicate with Christs body and blood. For else to eat & drink (as Paul saith) they have houses of their own.
There be two euils about the Sacraments, which to auoyde, the holy Ghost hath taught vs. For least we should with the Papists, think Christs body present in, or with the bread really, naturally, and corporally, to be receiued wc our bodily mouth (where ⟨p. 113⟩there is no other presence of Christs body then spirituall, and to the faith) in many places he kéepeth still the name of bread, as in the Epistle to the Corinthians, the tenth and eleuenth Chapters. And least we shold make to light of it, making it but a bare signe and no better then common bread, the holy Ghost calleth it Christs body; whose spéech I wish we would follow and that not onely as well to auoyde the euill, which is now a dayes most to be feared, concerning the Sacrament, I meane, of contemning it: as also for that no faithfull man commeth to the Sacrament to receiue bread simply, but rather, yea, altogether to communicate with Christs body and bloud. For else to eate & drink (as Paul saith) they haue houses of their owne.