A17641:410
Commentaries of the divine John Calvin, upon the prophet Daniel, translated into English, especially…Commentaries of the diuine Iohn Caluine, vpon the prophet Daniell, translated into Englishe, especially…
Commentaries of the divine John Calvin, upon the prophet Daniel, translated into English, especially for the use of the family of the right honourable Earle of Huntingdon, to set forth as in a glass, how one may profitably read the Scriptures, by considering the text, meditating the sense thereof, and by prayerCommentaries of the diuine Iohn Caluine, vpon the prophet Daniell, translated into Englishe, especially for the vse of the family of the ryght honorable Earle of Huntingdon, to set forth as in a glasse, how one may profitably read the Scriptures, by consideryng the text, meditatyng the sense therof, and by prayer
London: printed by John Daye, 1570London: printed by Iohn Daye, 1570
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Biblical commentary book of Daniel › Chapter 5 › Part › Meditation
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Here Daniel declareth, by what occasion he was brought before the king: that he might read and interpret the writing. He saith that this was done by the Queen. Men doubt whether it was the wife of king Beltsazar, or his grandmother: but it is probable that the woman was now old which speaketh of the time of king Nebuchadnezzar. Albeit this conjecture peradventure is not very certain: therefore it is better here to suspend the judgement hereof, then to judge any thing rashly, but that we saw before that his wife sat at the table with him. But we must diligently note that which we may surely gather by the words of the Prophet, that is, that the kings ingratitude is cast him in the teeth, that he did not send for Daniel among the Mages, Chaldees, and Astrologians.
Here Daniel declareth, by what occasiō he was brought before the kyng: that he myght read and interprete the writing. He sayth that thys was done by the Quéene. Men doubt whether it was the wyfe of kyng Beltsazar, or hys grandmother: but it is probable that the woman was now olde which speaketh of the tyme of kyng Nebuchadnezer. Albeit thys coniecture peraduenture is not very certayne: therefore it is better here to suspend the iudgement hereof, then to iudge any thyng rashly, but that we saw before that hys wyfe satte at the table with him. But we must diligently note that which we may surely gather by the wordes of the Prophet, that is, that the kinges ingratitude is cast him in the téeth, that he did not send for Daniel among the Mages, Chaldees, and Astrologians.
The holy man would not be counted in that order: and he were worthy that God should spoil him of his prophetical spirit, if he had joined him self with these deceivers: and it easily appeareth that he was separated from them. The king Nebuchadnezzar had made him ruler over all the Mages: but he would not use this honour, because (as I have said) he should have deprived him self of the gift of prophecy. For we must see what is lawful for us to do. We know that we are prone to nothing more then to be drawn away with the enticements of the world, especially with ambition, which blindeth us, and troubleth all our senses: and there is no greater pestilence. For when any man seeth that he can either get some honour or some gain, he doth not consider what is lawful or what God permitteth, but is carried away as it were with a blind madness. The same