A17642:1019
The commentaries of M. John Calvin upon the Acts of the Apostles, faithfully translated…The commentaries of M. Iohn Caluin vpon the Actes of the Apostles, faithfully translated…
The commentaries of M. John Calvin upon the Acts of the Apostles, faithfully translated out of Latin into English for the great profit of our country-men, by Christopher Fetherstone student in divinityThe commentaries of M. Iohn Caluin vpon the Actes of the Apostles, faithfully translated out of Latine into English for the great profite of our countrie-men, by Christopher Fetherstone student in diuinitie
Londini: printed by Thomas Dawson, 1585
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4 They delivered them the decrees to keep. In these words Luke doeth signify unto us how desirous Paul was of peace. The best and strongest bond to keep and foster peace among the churches, was to keep that which was set down by the Apostles. When Paul taketh great pains about that, he taketh great heed least through his fault there arise any trouble. And let us remember that that continued but for a time: because so soon as he seeth the danger of offence cease, he doeth quite unburden the churches, and setting apart the decree, he maketh that free which the Apostles had there forbidden. And yet doth not he can cel or violate by that abrogation that which the Apostles had decreed, or contemn the authors themselves: because they were not determined to establish a perpetual law: but only to mitigate for a short time that which might hurt weak consciences: as I did more at large declare in the former chapter: whereby the folly of the papists is sufficiently refuted, who do grievously lay to our charge that we be far unlike Paul: because we will have the consciences of the godly governed by the word of God alone, setting light by the decrees of the church, as they call them, and not to be subject to the will of men. But as I have already said, Paul meant nothing less, then to ensnare mens consciences in the snare of necessity, for he is not contrary to himself, when he crieth in other places,1 that all things are clean to the clean. And again, He which is clean eateth all things. And again, The kingdom of God is not meat and drink.2 And again, Meat doth not commend us to God. Again, Eat all things which are sold in the shambles, asking no question for con science sake. But in one word he reconcileth those things which might otherwise seem to disagree,3 when he commandeth to abstain from things sacrificed to idols, for another mans conscience sake. Nevertheless he taketh great heed that he bind not godly souls with the laws of men. Therefore we attempt nothing at this day which is contrary to, or disagreeing with Paul. But the papists mock us too grossly when they compare ⟨p. 387⟩their laws with the decrees of the Apostles. The Apostles invented no new worship of God, they had erected no new spiritual government: but for the desire they had to maintain peace they exhorted the gentiles, that they would yield a little to the Jews.