A17642:1397
The commentaries of M. John Calvin upon the Acts of the Apostles, faithfully translated…The commentaries of M. Iohn Caluin vpon the Actes of the Apostles, faithfully translated…
The commentaries of M. John Calvin upon the Acts of the Apostles, faithfully translated out of Latin into English for the great profit of our country-men, by Christopher Fetherstone student in divinityThe commentaries of M. Iohn Caluin vpon the Actes of the Apostles, faithfully translated out of Latine into English for the great profite of our countrie-men, by Christopher Fetherstone student in diuinitie
Londini: printed by Thomas Dawson, 1585
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Neither angel nor spirit. This place is expounded two manner of ways. Many refer it unto the holy Ghost: which seemeth to be unlikely. For howsoever the Sadducees be to be holden excused in other errors: yet because the scripture doeth so often repeat the name of the Spirit, I will scarce believe that they denied that which the Pharisees believed only lightly and obscurely. For even these men had no distinct faith concerning the holy Spirit, that they did acknowledge the proper person of the Spirit in the substance of God. Some will have Angel and Spirit to signify one thing, as if one thing were spoken twice. But to what end was it to repeat a thing which was plain enough? I warrant you that member which followeth did deceive them, where Luke seemeth to make no distinction. But we showed the reason before: because seeing the souls of men and Angels are of one and the same nature and substance, they be both placed in one order. Therefore I do not doubt but that this is Luke his true meaning that the Sadducees did deny Angels, and also all manner of Spirits.
Neither angell nor spirite. This place is expounded two manner of wayes. Many referre it vnto the holy Ghost: which seemeth to bee vnlikely. For howsoeuer the Saduces be to be holden excused in other errours: yet because the scripture doeth so often repeate the name of the Spirite, I will scarce beleeue that they denyed that which the Pharises beleeued onely lightly and obscurely. For euen these men had no distinct faith concerning the holy Spirite, that they did acknowledge the proper person of the Spirit in the substance of God. Some wil haue Angel and Spirite to signifie one thing, as if one thing were spoken twise. But to what ende was it to repeate a thing which was plaine enough? I warraunt you that member which followeth did deceiue them, where Luke seemeth to make no distinction. But we shewed the reason before: because seeing the soules of men and Angels are of one and the same nature and substance, they be both placed in one order. Therefore I do not doubt but that this is Luke his true meaning that the Saduces did denie Angels, and also all maner of Spirites.
Now for as much as Paul crieth that he is a Pharisee in this point of doctrine, he doeth flatly condemn all brainsick fellows