The commentaries of M. John Calvin upon the Acts of the Apostles, faithfully translated…The commentaries of M. Iohn Caluin vpon the Actes of the Apostles, faithfully translated…

11 To worship. First it is certain that he came for other causes, and he will afterward confess that this was the chief, that he might bring alms for the sustentation of the brethren. But we may well excuse him, because it was not of necessity that he should give an account of his coming, only he meant by the way to excuse himself of corrupt religion. Wherefore though he came to Jerusalem for some other cause, yet this is always true, that he came with no other mind, but to profess himself to be a worshipper of God, and to approve the holiness of the Temple by his worshipping. The other question is more hard, how he saith that he came to worship, seeing the religion of the temple was already abolished, and all difference of the temple taken away. I answer in this place likewise, that though he do not make his purpose known, yet he doth not lie or dissemble. For the faithful servants of Christ were not forbidden to worship in the Temple, so they did not tie holiness to the place: but did lift up pure hands freely without making choice of places.¹ It was lawful for Paul to enter into the temple after he was come to Jerusalem, that he might make his godliness known, and there to use the solemn rites of the worship of God, because he was void of superstition: so he did not offer any propitiatory sacrifices which were contrary to the Gospel. Therefore religion did not compel him to come to Jerusalem according to the appointment of the law, as if the sanctuary were the face of God as in times past: yet he doeth not abhor the external worship which was unto men a testimony of godliness.

11 To worship. First it is certaine that he came for other causes, and he will afterward confesse that this was the chiefe, that he might bring almes for the sustentation of the brethren. But we may well excuse him, because it was not of necessitie that hee shoulde giue an account of his comming, onely he meant by the way to excuse himselfe of corrupt religion. Wherefore though he came to Ierusalem for some other cause, yet this is alwayes true, that he came with no other minde, but to professe himselfe to be a worshipper of God, and to approue the holinesse of the Temple by his worshipping. The other question is more harde, how he saith that he came to worship, seing the religion of the temple was alreadie abolished, and all difference of the temple taken away. I answere in this place likewise, that though he do not make his purpose knowne, yet he doth not lie or dissemble. For the faithfull seruants of Christ were not forbidden to worshippe in the Temple, so they did not tie holinesse to the place: but did lift vp pure handes freely without making choice of places.