A17642:373
The commentaries of M. John Calvin upon the Acts of the Apostles, faithfully translated…The commentaries of M. Iohn Caluin vpon the Actes of the Apostles, faithfully translated…
The commentaries of M. John Calvin upon the Acts of the Apostles, faithfully translated out of Latin into English for the great profit of our country-men, by Christopher Fetherstone student in divinityThe commentaries of M. Iohn Caluin vpon the Actes of the Apostles, faithfully translated out of Latine into English for the great profite of our countrie-men, by Christopher Fetherstone student in diuinitie
Londini: printed by Thomas Dawson, 1585
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1 There appeareth as yet some colour of equity in the highest priest and in the council: and yet notwithstanding there is a most unjust prejudice in his words. For he asketh him not what cause he had to teach thus, neither doth he admit him unto the defence of right (which was notwithstanding the chief:) but he demandeth precisely whether Stephen uttered these words whatsoever they were: as the Papists at this day will not demand what doctrine it is, and whether it can be proved out of the scriptures: but they enquire whether any man durst mutter against their superstitions, that so soon as he is convict, they may forthwith burn him. Furthermore, Stephen's answer may seem at the first blush absurd and foolish. He beginneth first at the very first beginning: afterward he maketh a long narration, wherein there is no mention made in a manner of the matter in hand. And there can be no greater fault than to utter many words, which are nothing appertinent unto the matter. But whosoever shall throughly consider this long speech, he shall find nothing therein which is superfluous: and shall full well perceive that Steven speaketh very appertinently, as the matter requireth. He was accused as an Apostate or revolt, which did attempt the overthrow of religion and the worship of God. Therefore he beateth in this diligently, that he retaineth that God which the fathers have always worshipped. So that he turneth away the crime of wicked backsliding: and declareth that his enemies were pricked forward with nothing less than with the zeal of the law. For they bare a show that they were wholly determined to increase the glory of God. Therefore he wringeth from them this false boasting. And because they had the fathers always in their mouths because they were puffed up with the glory of their nation: Stephen declareth also, that they have no cause to be proud of this: but rather, that the corruptions of the fathers was so great & so many, that they ought to to be ashamed and humbled. As concerning the principal state of the cause, because the question was concerning the temple and the ceremonies, he affirmeth plainly that their fathers were elected of God to be a peculiar people before there was any temple, and before Moses was born. And to this end tendeth that exordium or beginning which is so far fet.
1 There appeareth as yet some colour of equitie in the highest priest and in the councell: and yet notwithstanding there is a most vniust preiudice in his wordes. For he asketh him not what cause he had to teach thus, neither doth he admit him vnto the defence of right (which was notwithstanding the chief:) but he demandeth precisely whether Steeuen vttered these wordes whatsoeuer they were: as the Papistes at this day will not demaund what doctrine it is, and whether it can be proued out of the scriptures: but they enquire whether any man durst mutter against their superstitiōs, that so soon as he is cōuict, they may forthwith burne him. Furthermore, Steeuens answere may seeme at the first blush absurd and foolish. He beginneth first at the very first beginning: afterward he maketh a long narration, wherein there is no mention made in a maner of the matter in hande. And there can be no greater fault than to vtter many wordes, which are nothing appertinent vnto the matter. But whosoeuer shall throughly consider this long speech, hee shall finde nothing therein which is superfluous: and shall full well perceiue that Steuen speaketh very appertinently, as the matter requireth. He was accused as an Apostata or reuolt, which did attempt the ouerthrow of religion and the worship of God. Therefore he beateth in this diligently, that he reteineth that God which the fathers haue alwayes worshipped. So that he turneth away the crime of wicked backsliding: and declareth that his enemies were pricked forward with nothing lesse than with the zeale of the law. For they bare a shew that they were wholy determined to encrease the glory of God. Therefore he wringeth from them this false boasting. And because they had the fathers alwaies in their mouths because they were puft vp with the glorie of their nation: Steeuen declareth also, that they haue no cause to be proud of this: but rather, that the corruptiōs of the fathers was so great & so manie, that they ought to to be ashamed and humbled. As concerning the principall state of the cause, because the question was concerning the temple and the ceremonies, he affirmeth plainely that their fathers were elected of God to bee a peculiar people before there was any temple, and before Moses was born. And to this end tendeth that exordium or beginning which is so far fet.