A19142:1013
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6. After all this, out of Mr. Hy. his papers, it pleased the Def. to bring in some pieces out of the Abridgement: which for substance are such as diverse times have been handled before: and therefore need not much labour in this place.
6. After all this, out of Mr. Hy. his papiers, it pleased the Def. to bring in some peices out of the Abrigement: which for substance are suche as diverse times have been handled before: and therfor need not muche labor in this place.
The first is, that many people in our land, are known to hold the Sacraments not rightly and sufficiently administered or received without them. For the force of such an opinion in the multitude, many testimonies are alleged in the Abridgement, and applied unto this assertion, not in deed to prove the same simply, but to show what is the consequence of it. All these the Def. left out, and the Rej. had no mind to take them in, but chose rather to rest in this: they are no proofs of the assumption. It was added by the Repl. the opinion even of a few, may make some action unlawful, which the opinion of many other cannot make lawful. 1. Cot. 10.28. To avoid this, the Rejoinder had nothing material to say, before he had changed unlawful into simply unlawful.
The first is, that many people in our land, are knowen to hold the Sacraments not rightly and sufficiently administred or receyved without them. For the force of suche an opinion in the muliitude, many testimonies are alledged in the Abrigement, and applied unto this assertion, not in deed to prove the same simplie, but to shew what is the consequence of it. All these the Def. left out, and the Rej. had no minde to take them in, but chose rather to rest in this: they are no proofs of the assumption. It was added by the Repl. the opinion even of a few, may make some action unlawfull, which the opinion of many other cannot make lawfull. 1. Cot. 10.28. To avoyd this, the Rejoynder had nothing materiall to say, before he had changed unlawfull into simplie unlawfull.