A19142:1020
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
As for the rest, that so conceit of the Ceremonies, which are not of your disciplining, saith the Rejoinder) and yet are conformable they are not many. As if those of our disciplinating, were so conceited, or those of Wales, Non-residents, and dumb-residents forlorn charges, who are not disciplined by us, were either few or of reformed judgement. Surely D.B. is not like himself, when he upon engagement defendeth that which cannot be defended.
As for the rest, that so conceyt of the Ceremonies, which are not of your disciplining, sayth the Rejoynder) and yet are conformable they are not many. As if those of our disciplinating, were so conceyted, or those of Wales, Non-residents, and dumb-residents forlorne charges, who are not disciplined by us, were eyther few or of reformed judgement. Surely D.B. is not like himself, when he upon ingagement defendeth that which cannot be defended.
7. The second thing brought out of the abridgement, is about the punishment inflicted for omission of our Ceremonies, greater then for breaking of Gods law, in perjury and adultery. Now this hath formerly been handled. In this place therefore, it shall suffice, to set a few notes, upon the Rej. his answers. 1. He distinguisheth ⟨p. 204⟩betwixt punishing, and punishing as a sin. As if punishment in the internal nature of it, were not of sin! 2. He distinguisheth betwixt internal peace of the Church, consisting more in observance of Gods commandments, and the peace of her external policy, impeached by the neglect of her constitutions. Whereas he should have made the distinction betwixt one consisting, & another, or betwixt one impeaching, & another.
7. The second thing brought out of the abridgement, is about the punishment inflicted for omission of our Ceremonies, greater then for breaking of Gods law, in perjurie and adulterie. Now this hath formerly been handled. In this place therfore, it shall suffize, to set a few notes, upon the Rej. his answers. 1. He distinguisheth