A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Against the Def. his distinction, betwixt omission, and contempt, the Reply was 1. that mere omission hath been punished with suspension. Of which the Rejoinder ⟨p. 205⟩requireth a continued instance. To which I answer, that one instance may be given in Ipswich, where D. B. was Preacher. For most of the Ministers were suspended upon the complaint of one Web, who professed, that he would not put on the Surplice except others did. D. B. may inquire easily if it was not so. As for continuance, it maketh not to the purpose, except all malefactors be not only put in prison, but also continued in the same, above the Judges pleasure.

Against the Def. his distinction, betwixt omission, and contempt, the Replie was 1. that mere omission hath been punished with suspension. Of which the Rejoynder ⟨p. 205⟩requireth a continued instance. To which I answer, that one instance may be given in Ispswiche, where D. B. was Preacher. For most of the Ministers were suspended upon the complaint of one Web, who professed, that he would not put on the Surplice except others did. D. B. may inquire easily if it was not so. As for continuance, it maketh not to the purpose, except all malefactors be not onely put in prison, but also continued in the same, above the Iudges pleasure.

The Repl. for affirming, that punishments for mere omission, are provided for by Canon, is accused by the Rejoinder of an untruth in print.

The Repl. for affirming, that punishments for mere omission, are provided for by Canon, is accused by the Rejoynder of an untrueth in print.