A19142:1027
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
8. The last thing noted out of the Abridgement is, that non-Conformitants are accounted Schismatics, Puritans, and excommunicates, ipso facto, without appeal: which is without example. The Rejoinder here 1. denieth that flatly, without more words, which is plainly cited out of the 6. Canon, let the Canon therefore be looked upon, and that is enough. 2. He saith that the old anathema sit was as much as to excommunicate ipso facto.
8. The last thing noted out of the Abridgement is, that non-Cōformitants are accounted Scismatikes, Puritanes, and excommunicates, ipso facto, without appeal: which is without example. The Rejoynder here 1. denieth that flatly, without more words, which is plainly cited out of the 6. Canon, let the Canon therfore be looked upon, and that is enough. 2. He sayth that the ould anathema sit was as muche as to excommunicate ipso facto.
And yet King James himself, in his answer to Peron, doeth show, that the old anathema sit, ⟨p. 206⟩was only a declaring who ought to be excommunicated, and not an excommunication de facto. 3. He saith for Appeal, that none is admitted, from the highest Court, such as the Convocation is. As if either the Convocation were the highest court, or any court at all, for ought that I ever heard of the Court of Convocation, as I have of a Court of Parliament, or as if so much liberty were left unto a poor Minister, now standing at the Bishops bar, as to appeal to the next Convocation. The Rejoinder surely did not well consider what he spake.
And yet King Iames himself, in his answer to Perone, doeth shew, that the olde anathema sit, ⟨p. 206⟩was onely a declaring who ought to be excommunicated, and not an excommunication de facto. 3. He sayth for Appeal, that none is admitted, from the highest Court, suche as the Convocation is. As if eyther the Convocation were the highest court, or any court at all, for ought that I ever heard of the Court of Convocation, as I have of a Court of Parliament, or as if so muche libertie were left unto a poor Minister, now standing at the Bishops barre, as to appeal to the next Convocation. The Rejoynder surely did not well consider what he spake.