A19142:1050
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
If these words be not to the purpose, in the Rejoinder his own conscience, then I despair of satisfying him about any testimony that maketh against that ⟨p. 217⟩tenet which he is resolved to maintain (as they say) by hook or crook.
If these words be not to the purpose, in the Rejoynder his owne conscience, then I despaire of satisfying him about any testimonie that maketh against that ⟨p. 217⟩tenet which he is resolved to mainteyne (as they say) by hooke or crooke.
9. D. Fulke (saith the Rejoinder did not think humane Ceremonies to be condemned for being significant, when no religion, or service of God is placed in them. Which is as much as if he had said: D. F. did not think humane Ceremonies to be condemned for being significant, when they are not significant: For (as hath been showed in the former part, all religious Ceremonies instituted, by their signification to raise up the heart unto the honouring of God, have some religion and service of God placed in them. And that D. Fulke did mean by placing of religion, or Gods service in them, the using of them unto religious use, it appeareth by a like place in Act. 17. sect. 5. Though it be not simply unlawful, to express in painting the visible shapes showed in Visions to the Prophets, yet to make those shapes for any use of religion, is abominable idolatry.
9. D. Fulke (sayth the Rejoynder did not thinke humane Ceremonies to be condemned for being significant, when no religion, or service of God is placed in them. Which is as muche as if he had sayd: D. F. did not think humane Ceremonies to be condemned for being significant, when they are not significant: For (as hath been shewed in the former part, all religious Ceremonies instituted, by their signification to raise up the heart unto the honoring of God, have some religion and service of God placed in them. And that D. Fulke did mean by placing of religion, or Gods service in them, the using of them unto religious use, it appeareth by a like place in