A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

But D. R. saith the first: therefore he teacheth also the later. 2. Out of the former I conclude thus: if a Jewish rite may be without a Jewish opinion, then our Ceremonies may be Jewish, or Popish, without a Jewish, or Popish opinion, or doctrine.

But D. R. sayth the first: therfore he teacheth also the later. 2. Out of the former I conclude thus: if a Iewish rite may be without a Iewish opinion, then our Ceremonies may be Iewish, or Popish, without a Iewish, or Popish opinion, or doctrine.

But the first is affirmed by D. R. therefore the later also. Which if it be true, then both the Defend. and Rejoinder have taken a false ground of their Ceremonial doctrine, in affirming so confidently upon all occasions, that it is the opinion and doctrine only which maketh a Ceremony Jewish, Popish, or any way unlawful.

But the first is affirmed by D. R. therfore the later also. Which if it be true, then both the Defend. and Rejoynder have taken a false grounde of their Ceremoniall doctrine, in affirming so confidently upon all occasions, that it is the opinion and docdrine onely which maketh a Ceremonie Iewish, Popish, or any way unlawfull.

All this notwithstanding, the Rejoinder could not forbear, to accuse the Authors of the Abridgement, his old reverend friends, of shameful abusing the world, with false allegations of these Divines, nor to triumph in his discovering of this shame.

All this notwithstanding, the Rejoynder could not forbeare, to accuse the Authors of the Abridgement, his olde reverend friends, of sh•mefull abusing the world, with false allegations of these Divines, nor to triumphe in his discovering of this shame.