A19142:1087
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5. Daneus is the next (who maketh it blasphemy, to think, and teach, that any outward things (of humane institution) may be made a sign, in the Church, of spiritual things) the first answer is, that this was spoken in opposition to Bellarmines consecrating of creatures to signify, and work supernatural effects. Which is very true: but this must be added: that in this sentence, he toucheth only the signification, not the operation of those Cere. as any that readeth his words, may observe. The second answer is that Daneus (elsewhere) alloweth some significant Cere. But the Rej. should have done well, to name the place or places, which he meant by elsewhere. For we cannot by conjecture find it.
5. Daneus is the next (whoe maketh it blasphemie, to thinke, and teache, that any outward thinges (of humane institution) may be made a signe, in the Churche, of spirituall thinges) the first answer is, that this was spoken in opposition to Bellarmines consecrating of creatures to signifie, and worke supernaturall effects. Whiche is very true: but this must be added: that in this sētēce, he toucheth only the signification, not the operation of those Cere. as any that readeth his wordes, may observe. The second answer is that Daneus (elsewhere) alloweth some significant Cere. But the Rej. should have doen well, to name the place or places, which he meant by elsewhere. For we cannot by conjecture finde it.
This I am sure of, that it is not Isagoge, p. 3. l. 3. c. 11. where he saith, that the teaching under the law was […] signs, & earthly figures, as a Schoolmaster speaketh to young children: but under the Gospel, open, and manifest, as one dealeth with grown men. They then that thrust in significant Ceremonies, what do they but confound the most wise dispensation of God, and make a mingle-mangle of those things, which he hath separated asunder?
This I am sure of, that it is not Isagoge, p. 3. l. 3. c. 11. where he sayth, that the teaching under the law was 〈…〉 signes, & earthly figures, as a Schoolmaister speaketh to young children: but under the Gospell, open, and manfest, as one dealeth with growen men. They then that thrust in significant Ceremonies, what doe they but confounde the most wise dispensation of God, and make a mingle-mangle of those thinges, which he hath separated asunder?