A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

It is enough for any man, to read over Beza his eight and twelve Epistle, for understanding not only of his meaning, but also of his reasons.

It is enough for any man, to read over Beza his eyght and twelf Epistle, for understanding not onely of his meaning, but also of his reasons.

14. Because the Def. made Beza a singular man, in opposing all humane mystical Ceremonies, the Replier added out of Bellarmines observation (de effectu Sacram. l. 2. c. 30.) that at least Calvin, Barentius, and Chemnitius were of the same mind. Now concerning Calvin, enough hath been said before. For the other, mark what the Rejoinder hath to say.

14. Because the Def. made Beza a singular man, in opposing all humane mysticall Ceremonies, the Replier added out of Bellarmines observation (de effectu Sacram. l. 2. c. 30.) that at least Calvin, Barentius, and Chemnitius were of the same minde. Now concerning Calvin, enough hath been sayd before. For the other, marke what the Rejoynder hath to say.

The question (saith he) in that place of Bellarmine disputed, is of Ceremonies meritorious, and binding the conscience, out of the case of scandal. And is this all? Surely then the Rejoinder had no reason to object unto the Abridgers, and the Replier, abusing the Reader. For (to omit that which in the first part of our Dispute, hath been answered, concerning merit & binding) any one that looketh upon Bellarmine, de effect. Sacr. l. 2. cap. 30. may see, that he divideth the controversy betwixt us and the Papists, into six heads, the fourth is about binding the conscience, and the fifth about merit, but the third is whether the Church may appoint new Ceremonies? The Affirmative of this question Bellarmine proveth, from the Feast instituted by Mordecai, and that of Dedication,