A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

2. The testimony of all the rest (saith the Rej.) are perverted. 3. Sundry of the witnesses are known to have allowed our, and all, some significant Ceremonies. It is a shame therefore for men gloring of sincerity, in refusing the Ceremonies, thus to leave all sincerity, in alleging of Authors. In which never any protestant writers abused the world so much, as the Abridgement, and this cavilling Repl. Now 1. for the perverting of all testimonies, it is affirmed only, but not proved. Only some general suppositions are brought in, to support the accusation, all which have formerly been confuted. 2. Among those which he saith were known to allow of our Ceremonies, he nameth D. Humphrey, of whom Camden in his history of Q. Elizabeth, observeth, that he (though very learned and worthy) never was raised to Ecclesiastical preferments, because he allowed not our Ceremonies etc. Harding also objecteth him by name, with Mr. Samson, as one that had rather loose all, then use our Ceremonies, and Ivel (Apol. c. 5. div. 1.) doeth not deny, but defend it: besides how well he allowed of our Ceremonies, let all men judge by a certain letter of his here printed, written to the Bishops, the Copy bearing this inscription.

2. The testimonie of all the rest (sayth the Rej.) are perverted. 3. Sundrie of the witnesses are knowen to have allowed our, and all, some significant Ceremonies. It is a shame therfore for men gloring of synceritie, in refusing the Ceremonies, thus to leave all synceritie, in alleging of Authors. In which never any protestant writers abused the world so muche, as the Abrigement, and this cavilling Repl. Now 1. for the perverting of all testimonies, it is affirmed onely, but not proved. Onely some generall suppositions are brought in, to support the accusation, all which have formerly been confuted. 2. Among those which he sayth were knowen to allow of our Ceremonies, he nameth D. Humphry, of whome Cambden in his historie of Q. Elizabeth, observeth, that he (though very learned and worthy) never was raised to Ecclesiasticall preferments, because he allowed not our Ceremonies etc. Harding also objecteth him by name, with Mr. Samson, as one that had rather loose all, then use our Ceremonies, and Iuel (Apol. c. 5. div. 1.) doeth not denie, but defend it: besides how well he allowed of our Ceremonies, let all men judge by a certeine letter of his heere printed, written to the Bishops, the Copie bearing this inscription.