A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

12. Upon the former grant (that all those Jewish rites, which were once Gods institutions, are now abolished) the Repl. concluded, in the words of D. Whitakers: Num verò veteres figurae sublatae sunt, ut locus ⟨p. 279⟩esset novis? Num Divinae sublatae sunt, ut humanae succede•ent? Are Divine Ceremonies abolished, that humane may be erected in their place?

12. Vpon the former grante (that all those Iewish rites, which were once Gods institutions, are now abolished) the Repl. concluded, in the wordes of D. Whitakers: Num verò veteres figurae sublatae sunt, ut locus ⟨p. 279⟩esset novis? Num Divinae sublatae sunt, ut humanae succede•ent? Are Divine Ceremonies abolished, that humane may be erected in their place?

The Rej. hereupon complaineth of manifest abusing and perverting D. Whitaker his words. And why so, I pray? 1. D. Whitaker spake of Divine figures, and the Repl. by corrupt translation maketh him to speak of Divine Ceremonies. As if D. Whitakers did understand by figures typical prefigurations of things to come only, in his dispute against the Papists, who by Bellarmine in that place confess, the Ceremonies of the old Testament were figures of the new Testament, and therefore when the thing it self is come should cease.¹

The Rej. heerupon complaineth of manifest abusing and perverting D. Whitaker his wordes. And why so, I pray? 1. D. Whitaker spake of Divine figures, and the Repl. by corrupt translation maketh him to speak of Divine Ceremonies. As if D. Whitakers did understand by •igures typicall praefigurations of thinges to come onely, in his di•pute against the Papists, whoe by Bellarmine in that place confesse, the Ceremonies of the old Testament were figures of the new Testament, and therefore when the thing it selfe is come should cease.