A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

And what else could he understand, but significant Ceremonies? Doeth not the Rej. rather pervert D. Whitakers meaning, in making him to conclude against typical prefigurations, which Bellarmine did as well disclaim, as himself?

And what else could he understand, but significant Ceremonies? Doeth not the Rej. rather pervert D. Whitakers meaning, in making him to conclude against typicall praefigurations, which Bellarmine did as well disclaime, as himself?

2. He cuts off by the wast, D. Whitakers his sentence, saith the Rej. Let us therefore take-in the next words, according to the Rej. his own translation: Therefore if the Ceremonies of Moses were removed because they were typical, why should not the Popish Ceremonies be removed which are not less typical? Is not this above the wast, against significant Ceremonies? Certainly It was not the meaning of D. Whitaker to charge the Papists with typical praesignifications of Christ yet to come: and therefore he must needs understand, by typical, significant Ceremonies.

2. He cuts off by the wast, D. Whitakers his sentence, sayth the Rej. Let us therfor take-in the next wordes, according to the Rej. his owne translation: Therfore if the Ceremonies of Moses were removed because they were typicall, why should not the Popish Ceremonies be removed which are not lesse typicall? Is not this above the wast, against significant Ceremonies? Certainely It was not the meaning of D. Whitaker to charge the Papists with typicall praesignifications of Christ yet to come: and therfore he must needes understand, by typicall, significant Ceremonies.

3. The wholl• intention saith he) ws, to condemn the Popish Ceremony, as necessary, or Sacramental, But this could not be so: because Bellarmine in that place, first answereth about their figurative nature, and then after addeth: