A19142:1205
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
For this the Rejoinder accuseth him of an uncharitable heart, and an unlearned head. But I see no cause: as hath been fully showed in the confutation of that distinction, both in the first part of this writing, and also in the second Argument, or Chapter, of this part. Yet because the Rejoinder is so impatient, of hearing his distinction of essential and accidental worship, compared with the Papists vain distinctions: let any man consider a little the Popish distinctions, which Rivetus hath well noted and expressed in his Cases, on the second Commandment: Worship religious is either of it self, or by accident proper or improper of it self,1 or some other thing, for it self, or in regard of another. Primary or secondary, proper or Analogical. Absolute or respective, simple or according to some respect. Direct, or reductive, perfect or imperfect. And compare with them the Rej. his distinctions of Ceremonies, and worship, in the first part examined. I doubt not, but he will say, they come nearer together, in the very terms, then one would have expected.
For this the Rejoynder accuseth him of an uncharitable heart, and an unlearned head. But I see no cause: as hath been fully shewed in the confutation of that distinction, both in the first part of this writing, and also in the second Argument, or Chapter, of this part. Yet because the Rejoynder is so impatient, of hearing his distinction of essentiall and accidentall worship, compared with the Papists vaine distinctions: let any man consider a litle the Popish distinctions, which Rivetus hath well noted and expressed in his Cases, on the second Commandement: Worship religious is either of it selfe, or by accident proper or improper of it selfe,1 or some other thing, for it self, or in regard of another. Primarie or secondarie, proper or Analogicall. Absolute or respective, simple or according to some respect. Direct, or reductive, perfect or imperfect. And compare with them the Rej. his distinctions of Ceremonies, and worship, in the first part examined. I doubt not, but he will say, they come neerer together, in the very termes, then one would have exspected.
- 1Per se aut per accidens, proprius aut improprius: per se, aut per aliud, propter se, aut ratione alterius, primarius, aut secundarius, proprius, aut analogicus: absolutus, aut respectivus: simplex, aut secundum quid: directus, aut reductivus perfectus, aut imperfectus.