A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

His second answer is, that all worship of God among the Jews, was not significant in his sense of significant. What his sense is, I know not: but the sense and words of the Replier his argument, was of worship appointed, or instituted, beyond that which is natural, or necessary, without any institution, except the law written in every mans heart, be an institution; which he seemeth not to have conceived.

His second answere is, that all worship of God among the Iewes, was not significant in his sence of significant. What his sence is, I know not: but the sence and words of the Replier his argument, was of worship appointed, or instituted, beyond that which is naturaall, or necessarie, without any institution, except the law written in every mans heart, be an institution; which hee seemeth not to haue conceiued.

14 The last consideration by the Replier propounded was, that significant Ceremonies, which are by institution, ⟨p. 301⟩must needs belong unto the second Commandment; as he that maketh an accurate distinction of the Commandments, will presently see: but to man the second Commandment is (in regard of making) wholly negative. Ergo. The Rej. answereth first, that significant Ceremonies may belong rather to the third Commandment, as D. Ames referreth them; or accidentally to the fourth. Now as for accidental belonging to this or that Commandment, it is not in question. To the third Commandment they cannot be directly referred, according to that distinction of the Commandments, which the Rej. himself produceth, in the next words as accurate. As for D. Ames, let any man look upon his Medulla, lib. 2. cap. 13. th. 34.35.36. and he shall see how the Rej. mistook him.

14 The last consideration by the Replier propounded was, that significant Ceremonies, which are by institution, ⟨p. 301⟩must needs belong vnto the second Commandement; as he that maketh an accurate distinction of the Commandements, will presently see: but to man the second Commandement is (in regard of making) wholly negatiue. Ergo. The Rej. answereth first, that significant Ceremonies may belong rather to the third Commandement, as D. Ames referreth them; or accidentally to the fourth. Now as for accidentall belonging to this or that Commandement, it is not in question. To the third Commandement they cannot be directly referred, according to that distinction of the Commandements, which the Rej. himselfe produceth, in the next words as accurate. As for D. Ames, let any man looke vpon his Medulla, lib. 2. cap. 13. th. 34.35.36. and he shall see how the Rej. mistook him.