A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

2. The place quoted is in 3. tom. 3. Disp. 15. Sect. 2. The words (as the Replier hath them) are these: The first ⟨p. 310⟩error is, that only those signs which are written, ought to be retained and used in the Church. The second, that no outward worship of God is lawful, but only that which is appointed by God. The third, that the Church hath not power of commanding, and ordaining those things, (he meaneth mystical Ceremonies) which are necessary for convenient celebration of the Sacraments. Of which three points, there is none, wherein Suarez and the Def. do not jump. To this the Rej. first answereth, that Suarez doeth not propounded these three points, as three errors of the Protestants: because he mentioneth not Protestants, but Heretics, which reason is not worth the answering: because he mentioneth Heretics of this time, which phrase is oftener in the Jesuits writings, understood of Protestants, then of any other, as all know that have looked upon them. By the •ame reason, one may argue, that he understood no special Sect, or persons: because he mentioneth not any by name. But it shall appear, that his meaning could be of no other then Protestants.

2. The place quoted is in 3. tom. 3. Disp. 15. Sect. 2. The words (as the Replier hath them) are these: The first ⟨p. 310⟩errour is, that onely those signes which are written, ought to be retained and vsed in the Church. The second, that no outward worship of God is lawfull, but onely that which is appointed by God. The third, that the Church hath not power of commanding, and ordeyning those things, (he meaneth mysticall Ceremonies) which are necessary for convenient celebration of the Sacraments. Of which three poynts, there is none, wherein Suarez and the Def. doe not jumpe. To this the Rej. first answereth, that Suarez doeth not propounded these three points, as three errours of the Protestants: because hee mentioneth not Protestants, but Heretickes, which reason is not worth the answering: because hee mentioneth Heretickes of this time, which phraze is oftner in the Iesuites writings, understood of Protestants, then of any other, as all know that have looked vpon them. By the •ame reason, one may argue, that he understood no speciall Sect, or persons: bcause hee mentioneth not any by name. But it shall appeare, that his meaning could be of no other then Protestants.