A19142:1229
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Out of these two observations, I make these two conclusions: 1. If this error be necessarily founded on those three mentioned, (as Suarez saith, and showeth) then such Protestants as hold this (among whom the Rejoinder professeth the Defend. and his own name) hold also those. 2. If Protestants hold this tenet, that it is Superstition, for to intend worship in humane Ceremonies (as Suarez saith) then our Defender and Rejoinder in this point are by Protestants found guilty of Superstition. For they place special immediate, though improper, accidental, and secondary worship in humane Ceremonies; as is to be seen in this Rejoinder pag. 125.127. &c.
Out of these two observations, I make these two conclusions: 1. If this error be necessarily founded on those three mentioned, (as Suarez sayth, and sheweth) then suche Protestants as hold this (among whome the Rejoynder professeth the Defend. and his owne name) holde also those. 2. If Protestants holde this tenet, that it is Superstition, for to intend worship in humane Ceremonies (as Suarez sayth) then our Defender and Rejoynder in this point are by Protestants found guiltie of Superstition. For they place speciall immediat, though improper, accidentall, and secondarie worship in humane Ceremonies; as is to be seen in this Rejoynder pag. 125.127. &c.
Here they cannot escape, by alleging (as they use to do) that the Papists place proper essential worship in all their Ceremonies. For Suarez in the same place expoundeth the Popish tenet, concerning worship, just as they do theirs: Sacramental Ceremonies belong to secondary worship: not only because they contain External worship, but also in the very External worship it self, they are as it were accidents of other more noble actions.1
Heer they cannot •scape, by alleging (as they use to doe) that the Papists place proper essentiall worship in all their Ceremonies. For Suarez in the same place expoundeth the Popish tenet, concerning worship, just as they doe theirs: Sacramental Ceremonies belong to secondarie worship: not onely because they conteine External worship, but also in the very Externall worship it selfe, they are as it were accidents of other more noble actions.