A19142:1230
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Here they cannot escape, by alleging (as they use to do) that the Papists place proper essential worship in all their Ceremonies. For Suarez in the same place expoundeth the Popish tenet, concerning worship, just as they do theirs: Sacramental Ceremonies belong to secondary worship: not only because they contain External worship, but also in the very External worship it self, they are as it were accidents of other more noble actions.1
Heer they cannot •scape, by alleging (as they use to doe) that the Papists place proper essentiall worship in all their Ceremonies. For Suarez in the same place expoundeth the Popish tenet, concerning worship, just as they doe theirs: Sacramental Ceremonies belong to secondarie worship: not onely because they conteine External worship, but also in the very Externall worship it selfe, they are as it were accidents of other more noble actions.1
- 1Ceremoniae sacramentales pertinent ad cultum secundarium: non solum quia continent cultum ixternum: sed etiam quia in ipsomet externo cultu, sunt veluti accidentia aliarum a•tionum nobiliorum.
6. Hitherto we have had noting directly answered, concerning the three errors, which the Replier said Suarez imputed to Protestants, about Ceremonies in general. Nor is any other given but this: that Suarez ⟨p. 313⟩chargeth those errors, not on Protestants, but on Anabaptists: who hold this negative argument: whatsoever is not commanded in the Word, is unlawful. This the Anabaptists, and not the Protestants, hold, fanatically even about rites, and formalities, &c. To which I reply 1. that if Suarez his words be taken as before they were recited, & not as the Rejoinder doeth ill-translate them, then no man is conversant in the Protestant writings, or have read over that which is formerly cited out of them in these three general Arguments, but must needs confess, the very same sense is to be found in most of our principal Divines: and the same words in many: