A19142:1231
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6. Hitherto we have had noting directly answered, concerning the three errors, which the Replier said Suarez imputed to Protestants, about Ceremonies in general. Nor is any other given but this: that Suarez ⟨p. 313⟩chargeth those errors, not on Protestants, but on Anabaptists: who hold this negative argument: whatsoever is not commanded in the Word, is unlawful. This the Anabaptists, and not the Protestants, hold, fanatically even about rites, and formalities, &c. To which I reply 1. that if Suarez his words be taken as before they were recited, & not as the Rejoinder doeth ill-translate them, then no man is conversant in the Protestant writings, or have read over that which is formerly cited out of them in these three general Arguments, but must needs confess, the very same sense is to be found in most of our principal Divines: and the same words in many:1 It is not lawful to worship God with other external worship save with that which is in Scripture prescribed us. And humane inventions without warrant from God in Script. are to be reprehended.
6. Hitherto we have had noting directly answered, concerning the three errors, which the Replier sayd Suar•z imputed to Protestants, about Ceremonies in generall. Nor is any other given but this: that Suarez ⟨p. 313⟩chargeth those errors, not on Protestants, but on Anabaptists: whoe hold this negative argument: whatsoever is not commanded in the Word, is unlawfull. This the Anabaptistes, and not the Protestants, houlde, fanatically even about rites, and formalities, &c. To which I replie 1. that if Suarez his wordes be taken as before they were recited, & not as the Rejoynder doeth ill-translate them, then no man is conversant in the Protestant writings, or have read over that which is formerly cited out of them in these three generall Arguments, but must needs confesse, the very same sense is to be found in most of our principall Divines: and the same words in many:1 It is not lawfull to worship God with other external worship save with that which is in Scripture praescribed us. And humane inventions withou warrant from God in Script. are to be reprehended.