A19142:1233
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Part › Chapter 3 › SECT. 11. Concerning the Feast of Purim. Ester. 9.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
SECT. 11. Concerning the Feast of Purim. Ester. 9.
1. This example was, seven hundred year since, objected by Papists, unto the Waldenses, for humane Ceremonies: & since, by all Papists that have written against Protestants about Ceremonies; as Gregorius de Valentia, Bellarmine, Suarez, in the places before noted. And we need not seek for new answers about it, seeing that which our Divines have answered is sufficient. Our first answer is that of Junius to Bellarmine, de Cultu Sanct. lib. 3. cap. 10. Praeceptum •uit politicum: which words because they were translated, a precept of order, the Rejoynd. catcheth occasion to conclude from thence, that order doeth require institution of new things. But therein he misseth, except he can ⟨p. 316⟩prove some new religious thing instituted, beside a circumstance of time, which the Replier (whom he seeketh to involve in a contradiction) doeth expressly distinguish from things. His answer is, that though this precept were Political, yet by Junius himself, annot. 17. it was also significant. Wherein he mistaketh Junius his meaning, which is expounded annot. 28. It signifieth no days, nor represents mysteries, but is a commemoration that day instituted.1
1. THis example was, seven hundered yeer since, objected by Papists, unto the Waldenses, for humane Ceremonies: & since, by all Papists that have written against Protestants about Ceremomonies; as Gregorius de Valentia, Bellarmine, Suarez, in the places before noted. And we need not seeke for new answers about it, seing that which our Divines have answered is sufficient. Our first answer is that of Iunius to Bellarmine, de Cultu Sanct. lib. 3. cap. 10. Praeceptum uit politicum: whiche words because they were translated, a praecept of order, the Rejoynd. catcheth occasion to conclude from thence, that order doeth require institution of new thinges. But therin he misseth, except he can