A19142:1241
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. The Replier first observed, that this example is much alleged by Papists, against Protestants for their ⟨image 309⟩Ceremonies: and so indeed it hath been always, from the time of Waldenses, as was noted, in the 2. Chapter. of our first part. Bellarmine hath it twice: once, de Rom, Pont. l. 4. c. 17. and againe, de Cultu Sanct. l. 3. c. •. To this the Rej. answereth, that this example served […] Bellarmines turn, for imposition of Ceremonies upon the conscience as of necessity to be observed, as Gods laws; but it serveth the Defender his turn: because as Junius saith, Co•r. 3. l. 4. c. 17. an. 5.) it was not enjoined by way of authority, but taken up by consent. He would make us (as it seemeth) believe, that our Ceremonies are not enjoined by way of authority: and if he can do this, he may also persuade us, that we are for refusing them, excluded, suspended, deprived, excommunicated, fined, & imprisoned, without any way (lawful or unlawful) of authority. Concerning necessity in conscience, see the first part, chap. 6.
2. The Replier first observed, that this example is much alleged by Papists, against Protestants for their ⟨image 309⟩Ceremonies: and so indeed it hath beene alwayes, from the time of Waldenses, as was noted, in the 2. Chapter. of our first part. Bellarmine hath it twice: once, de Rom, Pont. l. 4. c. 17. and againe, de Cultu Sanct. l. 3. c. •. To this the Rej. answereth, that this example served 〈…〉 Bellarmines turne, for imposition of Ceremonies upon the conscience as of necessity to be observed, as Gods lawes; but it serveth the Defender his turne: because as Iunius saith, Co•r. 3. l. 4. c. 17. an. 5.) it was not injoyned by way of authority, but taken vp by consent. He would make us (as it seemeth) beleeve, that our Ceremonies are not injoyned by way of authority: and if he can doe this, he may also perswade us, that we are for refusing them, excluded, suspended, deprived, excommunicated, fined, & imprisoned, without any way (lawfull or vnlawfull) of authority. Concerning necessity in conscience, see the first part, chap. 6.