A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

4. To pass over circumstantial passages, the Def. (proving this Altar to be appointed unto Gods service, because it was a pattern of the Lords Altar, as our Cross is a resemblance of Christs Cross) was 1. reproved by the Replier: because the Cross, whereon Christ did suffer, was no more holy then Judas: and so not to be compared unto the Lords Altar. To this the Rejoinder in ⟨p. 324⟩many words, maketh show of saying something, but I leave it to the Reader, if he saith any thing. I (for my part) can not discern what it is.

4. To passe over circumstantiall passages, the Def. (proving this Altar to be appointed unto Gods service, because it was a patterne of the Lords Altar, as our Crosse is a resemblance of Christs Crosse) was 1. reproved by the Replier: because the Crosse, wheron Christ did suffer, was no more holy then Iudas: and so not to be compared unto the Lords Altar. To this the Rejoynder in ⟨p. 324⟩many wordes, maketh shew of saying something, but I leave it to the Reader, if he sayth any thinge. I (for my part) can not discerne what it is.

5. The Replier also in the second place alleged▪ that every resemblance of a holy thing, is not therefore holy: because then every Ale-house picture taken from holy things mentioned in Scripture, should be holy; and a model of the Temple, carried by a Tyrian workman, into his country for news, should have been holy.

5. The Replier also in the second place alleged▪ that every resemblance of a holy thing, is not therfor holy: because then every Ale-house picture taken from holy thinges mentioned in Scripture, should be holy; and a modell of the Temple, caried by a Tyrian workman, into his countrie for newes, should have been holy.