A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

3. For removing of that Magisterial censure of the •reat unlearnedness of the fore-said Position, it was no•ed that some learned men, were authors of it, or partakers in it. Junius is one: who (Cont. 1. lib. 4. cap. 2. an. 6) •ayth, that this distinction betwixt Divine and Apostolical traditions, is almost imaginary and superfluous. Where •he Rejoinder hath nothing to catch at, but only that •article almost. Take therefore another place of the same •unius (in his Hidelberg Theses de Traditionibus, th. 24) where without almost, he saith fully thus: The distinction of traditions into Divine and Apostolical is a false distinction, because such traditions are of one sort, for there be no Apostolical traditions but such as are delivered from God.¹

3. For removing of that Magisteriall censure of the •reat unlearnednesse of the fore-sayd Position, it was no•ed that some learned men, were authors of it, or parta•ers in it. Iunius is one: who (Cont. 1. lib. 4. cap. 2. an. 6) •ayth, that this distinction betwixt Divine and Apostoli•all traditions, is almost imaginarie and superfluous. Wher •he Rejoynder hath nothing to catch at, but onely that •article almost. Take therfore another place of the same •unius (in his Hidelberg Theses de Traditionibus, th. 24) where without almost, he sayth fully thus: The distinction of traditions into Divine and Apostolicall is a false distinction, because such traditions are of one sort, for there be no Apostolicall traditions but such as are delivered from God.¹