A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

2. Concerning Lev. 26. it was alleged by the Rep•. that those (at lest some of those) titular pillars were firs• ▪ only set up for civill use. To which the Rej. answereth, that this was not the first beginning of their religiou• use: which is nothing to the purpose, except no use be good but religious. 2. that though many statues which afterward only for worship, were at the first, for civill respects and had still a civill use, (for this antecedent only is the Repliers) yet it doeth not follow, they were civill at the first ▪ which answer is by it self confuted.

2. Concerning Lev. 26. it was alleged by the Rep•. that those (at lest some of those) titular pillars were firs• ▪ onely set up for civill use. To which the Rej. answereth, that this was not the first beginning of their religiou• use: which is nothing to the purpose, except no use be good but religious. 2. that though many statues which afterward onely for worship, were at the first, for civill respects and had still a civill use, (for this antecedent onely is the Repliers) yet it doeth not follow, they were civill at the first ▪ which answer is by it selfe confuted.

3. Calvins collection or conjecture, was objected: that these statues were erected, to represent God: and this was answered, that according to Calvins phrase, there is a representation of God, in all pictures that corrupt Gods spiritual worship. The Rej. opposeth, that Calvin on