A19142:1367
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. Some of these places (saith the Rejoinder) a•• grossly mistaken, misalleged, and abused. as Isai. 1.29. an• 2.20. where confusion, and not Godly shame for sin is spoke• of: Ezech. 16.54. not speaking of hardening others: 1. Cor. 8.10. speaking of a thing in it self evil: Exod. 34.12. an• Deut. 7.4. speaking of marriage and league with Heathen• and Gal. 2.5. not respecting Ceremonies abused. To the first, I answer, 1. that the shame and confusion judicial which is brought upon Idolaters, is because they are not ash• med unto repentance. 2. All those of whom the Prophet speaketh, were not judicially confounded, but penitentially ashamed. Jer. 31.19. Ezech. 16.54. should have been joined to the former allegations, as speaking of mens shame in themselves, not of hardening others. 1. Cor. 8 10. condemneth emboldening others to sin, by ⟨p. 387⟩eating things offered to Idols, though it were otherwise lawful, as appeareth, 1. Cor. 10.29. And a question may •e made, whether it had been more unlawful, to eat •uch things in the Idols Temple, then to take from hence things notoriously known to be such, and eat hem in Christian Congregations, at Love-feasts? Exo. 4.12.