A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

SECT. 5. Concerning Daniels abstinence.

Here nothing is handled but Daniels example, Dan. 1.8. Neither doeth the Rejoinder add any thing to the Defendant, but only, that Daniels forbearance of the Kings meat, was grounded on special ceremonial injunctions of God, and not upon our moral rule, that the abuse had made the use unlawful; nor was this a Ceremony in Gods worship. To which I answer 1. that our argument is also grounded on the equity of Ceremonial injunctions, and that equity is our moral rule.

HEere nothing is handled but Daniels example, Dan. 1.8. Neither doeth the Rejoynder adde any thing to the Defendant, but onely, that Daniels forbearance of the Kings meat, was grounded on speciall ceremoniall injunctions of God, and not upon our morall rule, that the abuse had made the use unlawfull; nor was this a Ceremony in Gods worship. To which I answer 1. that our argument is also grounded on the equitie of Ceremoniall injunctions, and that equity is our morall rule.

2. It must needs be, that if good meats (not otherwise unclean) were unlawful unto Daniel, then it was because they were defiled by Idolatry: which is all that this place was alleged for.

2. It must needs be, that if good meats (not otherwise uncleane) were unlawfull unto Daniel, then it was because they were defiled by Idolatry: which is all that this place was alleged for.