A19142:1439
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Part › Chapter 4 › SECT. 7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20. Councels, and Ancient… › Crossing.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Crossing.
1. The Minister (saith the Rejoinder) with us, may not cross himself, the people, or other things. Now though this be nothing to the purpose, yet I would fain know, out of what Canon, he fetcheth this may not with us? And if there were any such, upon what reason it is grounded, that will not take our crossing of the baptized person, by the nose?
1. The Minister (sayth the Rejoynder) with us, may not crosse himselfe, the people, or other things. Now though this be nothing to the purpose, yet I would faine know, out of what Canon, hee fetcheth this may not with us? And if there were any such, upon what reason it is grounded, that will not take our crossing of the baptized person, by the nose?
2. With us, the child may not be crossed before Baptism, ⟨p. 428⟩nor after, with Chrism-oil. But of that same may not before, I ask as before. And as for crossing with oil, I would be informed, what religious difference there is, betwixt dry Crosses, and oil, as G. Parisiensis distinguisheth them?
2. With us, the childe may not be crossed before Baptisme, ⟨p. 428⟩nor after, with Chrisme-oyle. But of that same may not before, I aske as before. And as for crossing with oyle, I would be informed, what religious difference there is, betwixt drie Crosses, and oyle, as G. Parisiensis distinguisheth them?