A19142:1489
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. Oecolampadius requireth a Minister of Scaphusium (Epist. 1. lib. 1. pag. 129.) utterly to cast off all the Ceremonies of the Papists, in celebration of the Lords Supper, as those which cannot be continued, without nourishing of the superstition and impiety, whereunto they served of old. The Rejoinder answereth 1. That this was not Oecolampadius his own advise, but that which some others would have had him given. But he propounding it, and only excusing himself modestly that he was slow in put on others so far (insinuating that though he himself was so resolved, yet he durst not urge others thereto, and therefore only requireth conveniency without offence, sufficiently testifieth his allowance of that advise. And who (think you) were the Authors of that advise, but zuinglius &c ▪ He 2. addeth, out of divers Epistles, that Oecolampadius would not have all that country tie themselves in Ceremonies, to Basil, Tigure, or Bern that he hold gold•• silver, glass, or wooden vessels in administration of the Sacrament, indifferent. As if any of us were of another mind this is a mere colour of something, where nothing is to be found.
2. Oecolampadius requireth a Minister of Scaphusium (Epist. 1. lib. 1. pag. 129.) utterly to cast off all the Ceremonies of the Papists, in celebration of the Lords Supper, as those which cannot be continued, without nourishing of the superstition and impiety, whereunto they served of olde. The Rejoynder answereth 1. That this was not Oecolampadius his owne advise, but that which some others would have had him given. But he propounding it, and onely excusing himselfe modestly that he was slow in put on others so farre (insinuating that though he himselfe was so resolved, yet he durst not urge others thereto, and therefore onely requireth conveniency without offense, sufficiently testifieth his allowance of that advise. And who (thinke you) were the Authors of that advise, but zuinglius &c ▪ He 2. addeth, out of divers Epistles, that Oecolampadius would not have all that country tye themselves in Ceremonies, to Basil, Tigure, or Bern that he holde gold•• silver, glasse, or wooden vessels in administration of the Sacrament, indifferent. As if any of us were of another minde this is a meere colour of something, where nothing is to be found.