A19142:1504
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
8. Many other Divines were named, as Zanchius, Pezelius, Mollerus, Zegedinus, Daneus, Maccabeus, Zepperus, Wigandus, and Sadeel; but their words not cited, except only Sadeel's, for avoiding of unnecessary tediousness, they all speaking to the same purpose with the former. The Rejoinder hath one general answer for diverse of these; that they allowed some human Feasts, which have been abused to Superstition. Now though this be no direct answer, and the Authors may in part forget their own general rule, in some particular; yet this may be further said; that they accounted not these Feast-days such kind of Ceremonies, as we speak of. This appeareth in Zepper, who put them under the head of Order, cap. 13. whereas he handleth the Cross under the head of Sacramental Ceremonies, cap. 10. In particular, 1. Daneus and Zegedinus (saith the Rejoinder) speak not to our purpose. Daneus I have not at hand: but Zegedine in his tables of Baptism, calleth them Popish additions, by which Baptism is profaned. 2. Zanchies judgement ⟨p. 466⟩hath been showed. Namely that it was contrary to all such Ceremonies.
8. Many other Divines were named, as Zanchius, Pezelius, Mollerus, Zegedinus, Daneus, Machabeus, Zepperus, Wigandus, and Sadeel; but their words not cited, except onely Sadeels, for avoyding of unnecessarie tediousnesse, they all speaking to the same purpose with the former. The Rejoynder hath one general answer for diverse of these; that they allowed some human Feasts, which have been abused to Superstition. Now though this be no direct answer, and the Authors may in part forget their owne general rule, in some particular; yet this may be further sayd; that they accounted not these Feast-days such kinde of Ceremonies, as we speak of. This appeareth in Zepper, whoe put them under the head of Order, cap. 13. wheras he handleth the Crosse under the head of Sacramental Ceremonies, cap. 10. In particular, 1. Daneus and Zegedinus (sayth the Rejoynder) speak not to our purpose. Daneus I have not at hand: but Zegedine in his tables of Baptisme, calleth them Popish additions, by which Baptisme is prophaned. 2. Zanchies judgement ⟨p. 466⟩hath been shewed. Namely that it was contrarie to all such Ceremonies.