A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

And this doeth abundantly appear out of his Epist. to Q. Elizabeth, printed before, in English. 3. Zepper alloweth the ancient use of the Surplice. If he did, therein he should not have crossed his rule given, cap. 10. reg. 4. out of the Scriptures, at least in his opinion, except he judged the Surplice before that ancient use to have been notoriously abused unto Idolatry. But the trueth is, Zepper doeth but comparatively excuse a supposed ancient use of that garment, which in ancient times was not known, but as a civil habit, usual in hot countries. 4. Wigandus (saith the Rejoinder) was Illyricus his associate in the furious opposition of the Surplice. Whereas the trueth is, Illyricus himself did not furiously oppose, but use the Surplice, as Calvin testifieth, Epist. 117.

And this doeth abundantly appear out of his Epist. to Q. Elizabeth, printed before, in English. 3. Zepper alloweth the ancient use of the Surplice. If he did, therin he should not have crossed his rule given, cap. 10. reg. 4. out of the Scriptures, at least in his opinion, except he judged the Surplice before that ancient use to have been notoriously abused unto Idolatrie. But the trueth is, Zepper doeth but comparatively excuse a supposed ancient use of that garment, which in ancient times was not knowen, but as a civil habit, usual in hote countries. 4. Wigandus (sayth the Rejoynder) was Illyricus his associat in the furious opposition of the Surplice. Wheras the trueth is, Illyricus himself did not furiously oppose, but use the Surplice, as Calvin testifieth, Epist. 117.

5. Sadeel's words are: We reject whatsoever remaineth in the Church of Rome, which came either from Jews, or Pagans. The Rejoinder answereth, that Sadeel showeth what Ceremonies the Refor. Churches of France did reject; but not what were necessarily to be rejected of all Churches: He useth also the limitation of Jewish and Paganish Ceremonies. But he clean mistaketh Sadeel's meaning: Jewish and Paganish, are no words of limitation, but of explication by way of reason. Our use of his testimony is 1. thus: Whatsoever Ceremonies they of France have rejected, are in Sadeel's judgement Jewish or Heathenish, which can have no lawful use in Gods worship. But the Churches of France have rejected our Ceremonies in controversy. Ergo. 2. Thus: If Jewish and Heathenish Ceremonies are