A19142:1512
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
12. B. Pilkinton said, that it is our fault generally, •hat we differ no more from the Papists, in all our ministry. True (answereth the Rejoinder) but he thought not •hese things to be simply unlawful. As if B. Pilkington had •earned, and taught a distribution of faults in religion, some unlawful, and some lawful faults! It is a new distinction coined since his time.
12. B. Pilkinton sayd, that it is our fault generally, •hat we differ no more from the Papists, in all our ministery. True (answereth the Rejoynder) but he thought not •hese things to be simply unlawfull. As if B. Pilkington had •earned, and taught a distribution of faults in religion, some unlawfull, and some lawfull faults! It is a new distinction coined since his time.
13. B. Westphaling (with Augustine) peremptorily •ffirmeth, that Jewish Ceremonies cannot be used, no not with an intent differing from that of the Jews, with out danger of damnation. We allow this (answereth the Rejoinder) because God hath repealed them; and to use them •ere to call the coming of Christ into question. And is it so great a sin, to use Jewish Ceremonies, without a Jewish intent? How then durst the Defendant and Rej. pag. 285. affirm, that to use some Jewish rite (even Circumcision it self) without a Jewish opinion, is not damnable? In one, or both of these places, they much forgot themselves. And they that disallow of a Jewish Ceremony, used without a Jewish opinion, how can they allow of a Popish Ceremony, in any use?
13. B. Westphaling (with Augustine) peremptorily •ffirmeth, that Iewish Ceremonies cannot be used, no not with an intent differing from that of the Iewes, with out danger of damnation. We allow this (answereth the Rejoynder) because God hath repealed them; and to use them ere to call the comming of Christ into question. And is it so great a sinne, to use Iewish Ceremonies, without a ewish intent? How then durst the Defendant and Rej. pag. 285. affirme, that to use some Iewish rite (even Circumision it selfe) without a Iewish opinion, is not damnable? In one, or both of these places, they much forgat themselves. And they that disallow of a Iewish Ceremony, used without a Iewish opinion, how can they allow of a Popish Ceremony, in any use?