A19142:1579
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To admit these words spoken not of the Priests in the Temple, but of Christian Ministers, this [alter habitus] was a better garment for the time of public duty, as Nepotian had, not any d•fferinge attire from that of the assembly. Thus much for Hi•rome.1
To admitt these wordes spoken not of the Preists in the Temple, but of Christian Ministers, this [alter habitus] was a better garment for the time of publike duetie, as Nepotian had, not any d•fferinge attire from that of the assembly. Thus much for Hi•rome.1
- 1Hac est dignitas vo•tra, ha• stabilitas, hac corona non quia tunicam indut• candidissim•m per Ecclesiam ambulasis.
Chrysostom when he saith, [This is your dignity, stability▪ crown, not that you walk through the Church in a white coat. Hom. 83. in Mat. necessarily requireth the same interpretation. For this most white coat was no ⟨p. 510⟩other then the better sort of people did usually wear, as well in other Countries, as at Rome, as hath been showed by the Ambassadors of Rhodes, and the shipmen of Egypt. Only the Bishops in humility thought it too sumptuous for daily use, and reserved it for the time of their public function.