A19142:1588
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Part › Chapter 4 › SECT. 25.26.27.28. Concerning the Defender his Reasons.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Replier also granted that Surplices might be turned into under garments for poor people; and wooden Crosses given them for firing.
The Rejoinder answereth 1. that this is no use of Ceremonies, as Ceremonies. As if he himself did alway speak formally!
The Rejoynder answereth 1. that this is no use of Ceremonies, as Ceremonies. As if he himself did allway speak formally!
The sentence immediately going before, was of things abused: And so this addition was of those things which are made Ceremonies. Yet if that be true, which the Rejoinder affirmed pag. 570. that a Surplice, as a Ceremony, is in the kind of a Garment, then it must needs follow, that this Ceremony may be given to the poor for a garment.
The sentence immediatly goeing before, was of things abused: And so this addition was of those thinges which are made Ceremonies. Yet if that be true, which the Rejoynder affirmed pag. 570. that a Surplice, as a Ceremonie, is in the kinde of a Garment, then it must needes follow, that this Ceremonie may be given to the poor for a garment.