A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

To this show of reason, the answer is easy: 1. If those two other ways be understood as partial and insufficient, then the Proposition is false: if as sufficient by themselves, without abolition, then I deny absolutely the Assumption, ⟨p. 515⟩as being a mere affirmation of that which is in question, according to the Repliers observation.

To this shew of reason, the answer is easy: 1. If those two other ways be understood as partial and insufficient, then the Proposition is false: if as sufficient by themselves, without abolition, then I denie absolutely the Assumtion, ⟨p. 515⟩as being a meer affirmation of that which is in quaestion, according to the Repliers observation.

2. Either this is understood of all Ceremonies abused, or only of some? If of all, our Reformation is to be blamed, which hath used abolition without any necessity. If of some only, the Defender ought to have told us, which they are, or by what mark we may know them? And omitting this, he saith neither Argumentation, nor certain affirmation in this Section.

2. Eyther this is understood of all Ceremonies abused, or onely of some? If of all, our Reformation is to be blamed, which hath used abolition without any necessitie. If of some onely, the Defender ought to have tould us, which they are, or by what marke we may know them? And omitting this, he sayth neyther Argumentation, nor certain affirmation in this Section.