A19142:1600
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Part › Chapter 4 › SECT. 25.26.27.28. Concerning the Defender his Reasons.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Replier not being willing to spend time about the comparison betwixt Popish, and Paganish Idolatry, referred the Defendant to the Abridgement, and Mr. Parker. Hereupon the Rejoinder taketh upon him to answer ⟨p. 517⟩what is found in them, about this comparison. In which discourse, because many things before answered are repeated, to ease my self, and the Reader, of tedious labour, I will only note the main grounds of his answers, pertaining directly to that comparison, and then set down some plain testimonies of our divines about it; because he partly denieth, and partly shifteth off Mr. Parkers quotations. His principal ground of answer is, that the Papists do not sin against the first Commandment, in worshipping a false God; but against the second only, in worshipping the true God, in a false manner. This he produceth (pag. 618,) as Doctor Ames his judgement:1 this he repeateth, pag. 624. and 630. But this is not so. For the wiser of the Heathen, knew well, that there was bat one true God, Creator of all things, and the ruder of the Papists, worship Creatures, more devoutly as divine objects, then those Heathen were wont to do.
The Replier not being willing to spend time about the comparison betwixt Popish, and Paganish Idolatry, referred the Defendant to the Abridgement, and Mr. Parker. Hereupon the Rejoynder taketh upon him to answer ⟨p. 517⟩what is found in them, about this comparison. In which discourse, because many things before answered are repeated, to ease my selfe, and the Reader, of tedious labour, I will onely note the maine grounds of his answers, pertaining directly to that comparison, and then set downe some plaine testimonies of our divines about it; because he partly denieth, and partly shifteth off Mr. Parkers quotations. His principall ground of answer is, that the Papists doe not sinne against the first Commandement, in worshipping a false God; but against the second onely, in worshipping the true God, in a fa•se manner. This he produceth (pag. 618,) as Doctor Ames his judgement:1 this he repeateth, pag. 624. and 630. But this is not so. For the wiser of the Heathen, knew well, that there was bat one true God, Creator of all things, and the ruder of the Papists, worship Creatures, more devoutly as divine objects, then those Heathen were wonte to doe.