A19142:1605
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Part › Chapter 4 › SECT. 25.26.27.28. Concerning the Defender his Reasons.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Blessed Bradford, in his ep. to the Lady Vane, hath these words sealed with his blood: There was never thing upon the •arth, so great, and so much an adversary to Gods true service, to Christs Death, Passion, Priest-hood, Sacrifice, and Kingdom; to the Ministry of Gods Word and Sacraments; to the Church of God; to Repentance, Faith, 1and all true godliness of life, as the Mass. Doctor Whitakers, de Sacram. pag. 582. Popish adoration built on the fiction of transubstantiation, is the foulest of all Idolatry. These testimonies concern the Mass, and the Cross. It were easy to add others, concerning divers particulars: as Sadeel, ad. Mon. Bur▪ Ar. 58. Pray for us most holy table-cloth or handkerchief of God What Idolatry is this? was there ever the like among the Gentiles? But for particulars, I refer the studious Reader, unto our Divines: and among them, in this point, I reckon Doctor Jackson, in his Original of Unbelief, Sect. 4. ⟨p. 520⟩Cap. 22. &c. where the title is, Of the Identity, or Equivalency of Superstition, in Rome Heathen, and Rome Christian, and cap. 38. he bringeth pregnant Instances, as among other, of Urbanus, the Patron of pleasant Companions; Gutmanus, the Warden of pudding-makers; and of S. Christopher, and S. George, men of the Painters or Heralds making; and yet adored as Gods. Nay alloweth of Sr. David Linsey, denying any difference to be betwixt Heathenish and Romish Idolatry. I will only add the words of Hospinian, de Orig. Templ. pag. 84. 2That some go about to lessen the Idols of Papists in comparison of that which was among the Heathens, is (that I say no more) most childishly done. Is not their Idolatry plainly recalled, the names only changed?
Blessed Bradford, in his ep. to the Lady Vane, hath these words sealed with his bloud: There was never thing upon the •arth, so great, and so much an adversary to Gods true service, to Christs Death, Passion, Priest-hood, Sacrifice, and Kingdome; to the Ministery of Gods Word and Sacraments; to the Church of God; to Repentance, Faith, 1