A19142:1630
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
A POSTSCRIPT.
Some Reader may inquire whence came this new writing about Ceremonies? And he may please to be informed, that after the Abridgement was printed, a great silence followed in England, about these matters (as if enough had been said on both sides) until D. Morton, then B. of Chester, not thinking it honest, to silence Ministers, for Ceremonies, before some answer was given unto their reasons they stood upon) undertook with great confidence to give a full Answer to all which was objected.
SOme Reader may inquire whence came this new writing about Ceremonies? And he may please to be informed, that after the Abrigement was printed, a great silence followed in England, about these matters (as if enough had been sayd on both sides) until D. Morton, then B. of Chester, not thinking it honest, to silence Ministers, for Ceremonies, before some answer was given unto their reasons they stood upon) undertooke with great confidence to give a full Answer to all which was objected.
This answer being printed, was divers years neglected, as containing little or nothing that had not formerly been confuted.
This answer being printed, was divers years neglected, as conteyning litle or nothing that had not formerly been confuted.