A19142:1633
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This answer being printed, was divers years neglected, as containing little or nothing that had not formerly been confuted.
This answer being printed, was divers years neglected, as conteyning litle or nothing that had not formerly been confuted.
But afterward (when silence was interpreted in such sense, as if it had been a yielding consent) it was by some thought fitting, that a brief Reply should be opposed.
But afterward (when silence was interpreted in such sence, as if it had been a yeelding cons•nt) it was by some thought fitting, that a breif Replie should be opposed.
This the Bishop thought not worthy of his own Rejoinder; but was contented to put it off unto D. Burges, as a friend to him, engaged in the cause, and wanting neither will, nor wit, nor words, nor credit.
This the Bishop thought not worthy of his owne Rejoynder; but was contented to put it off unto D. Burges, as a friend to him, ingaged in the cause, and wanting neyther will, nor witte, nor wordes, nor credit.