A19142:1648
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Defendant here maketh great flourishing in nine whole Sections, defining, dividing, and subdividing a scandal, as if he would make all clear before him: but at the end of all this preparation, he maketh no application of these Rules unto the matter in hand at all: but only, telleth his Reader, Pag. 154. That these divisions and subdivisions will expedite all difficulties, so that out of them he may collect the true and false sense of Scriptures alleged. ⟨p. 4⟩It were sufficient therefore either to deny this power to be in his divisions: or else to set down as many other subdivisions of scandal (which were easy to do) and then tell him that these will expedite the controversy, and that from them he may collect the errors of his answer. But I will notwithstanding briefly show my opinion concerning some of these dictates.
The Defendant here maketh great flourishing in nine whole Sections, defining, deviding, and subdividing a scandall, as if he would make all cleare before him: but at the end of all this preparation, he maketh no application of these Rules unto the matter in hand at all: but onely, telleth his Reader, Pag. 154. That these divisions and subdivisions will expedite all difficulties, so that out of them he may collect the true and false sense of Scriptures alledged. ⟨p. 4⟩It were sufficient therefore either to deny this power to be in his divisions: or else to sett downe as many other subdivisions of scandall (which were easie to doe) and then tell him that these will expedite the controversie, and that from them hee may collect the errours of his answer. But I will notwithstanding briefly shew my opinion concerning some of these d•ctates.
The definition which he only alloweth of as accurate is▪ that a s•andall is a wilful offence against Christians, in provoking of them unto any damnable error or sin, by any sensible external means: Sect. 1. Wherein notwithstanding many faults may be found. For 1. every scandal is not wilful, except the word be taken more largely then use of speech will allow. 2. Every scandal is not against Christians. 3. A scandal is not only by provoking to sin, but also in hindering from good. 4. What doth he mean to put in the word damnable? the occasioning of any sin, sufficeth to make up a scandal.