A19142:1658
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
SECT. X.
Among the instances of scandal arising from the Ceremonies, that which in the Abridgement hath the third place is set first by the Def. viz. that the superstitious Papist will be hardened in the liking of his abominable Religion, from which he seeth we borrow our ceremonies, and increase in his hope of the full restoring of it again. To this the Def. answereth, that our rites are not the ceremonies of Papists, because they are purged from superstition. But 1. that they are not purged from all superstition hath sufficiently been declared before. 2. This plea of transubstantiating of Ceremonies by the breath of our Convocation, is a mere shift, contrary not only to the language of all our Divines, and to that which every mans senses do tell him, but also to the public profession of the Church of England, in the preface to our service-book, as it is cited by him, pag. 127. For there we are told, 1. that an abatement is made of the exc•sse of ⟨p. 9⟩Popish Ceremonies: All therefore are not abolished, but some remain. And which be they, if these in question be not? 2. That some of the old Ceremonies do remain. What sense can be given of these words, if our Ceremonies be not the same with those which were of old among the Papists? if it were meant of old ceremonies not used among the Papists, then they do not remain, nor are retained, but restored. 3. That none are devised anew: therefore they must needs be taken from the Papists, or from the Fathers: but of the Fathers surplice or kneeling at the communion, no instance can be given: and as for the cross, the Def. himself will not defend, I think, all that use which the Fathers putt it to. 3. The Papists own words do sufficiently manifest how they are hardened by the imposition and use of our ceremonies. For as it is showed in the Abridgement p. 25. they seek to justify their superstition by this, that we have borrowed our ceremonies from them. And some of them thence conclude (as there is showed) that our Governors like well of their superstition Beside Gretser, a principal Jesuit saith, that in these ceremonies our Ministers are as Apes of Popish Priests, Apol. pro Gregor. 7. pag. 8. and in his defence, tom. 2. lib. 4. cap. 16. saith, that our Convocation house in imposing these Ceremonies, do cross the judgement of our best Divines.