A19142:206
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
A table showing the particulars of special consideration in every chapter.
A table shewing the particulars of speciall consideration in every chapter.
Chap. 1.
Its lawful for an author upon just occasion, not to set his name to his work. p: 2. The term of scurrility cast upon the Replyer by contempt, is wiped away. p: 2.3.4. The difference of Lord pastor, and ministerial pastor is unlawful. p: 6.
Its lawfull for an author vpon just occasion, not to set his name to his work. p: 2. The terme of scurrility cast vpon the Replyer by contempt, is wiped away. p: 2.3.4. The difference of Lord pastor, and ministeriall pastor is vnlawfull. p: 6.
Chap. 2.
The first rise of Ceremonies p: 8. Ceremonies refused by the waldenses upon the same ground we refuse them p: 8. The Bishop and the Rejoy: join with the Lutherans in maintaining of images p: 9. The protestants most received opinion touching Cerem: p: 10. T: C: his judgment of significant Ceremonies was ever, that they were unlawful. p: 11. That Tenet of inconveniency without unlawfulness, is unsound, and uncomfortable p: 12.13