A19142:208
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Chap. 1.
Its lawful for an author upon just occasion, not to set his name to his work. p: 2. The term of scurrility cast upon the Replyer by contempt, is wiped away. p: 2.3.4. The difference of Lord pastor, and ministerial pastor is unlawful. p: 6.
Its lawfull for an author vpon just occasion, not to set his name to his work. p: 2. The terme of scurrility cast vpon the Replyer by contempt, is wiped away. p: 2.3.4. The difference of Lord pastor, and ministeriall pastor is vnlawfull. p: 6.
Chap. 2.
The first rise of Ceremonies p: 8. Ceremonies refused by the waldenses upon the same ground we refuse them p: 8. The Bishop and the Rejoy: join with the Lutherans in maintaining of images p: 9. The protestants most received opinion touching Cerem: p: 10. T: C: his judgment of significant Ceremonies was ever, that they were unlawful. p: 11. That Tenet of inconveniency without unlawfulness, is unsound, and uncomfortable p: 12.13