A19142:209
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Chap. 2.
The first rise of Ceremonies p: 8. Ceremonies refused by the waldenses upon the same ground we refuse them p: 8. The Bishop and the Rejoy: join with the Lutherans in maintaining of images p: 9. The protestants most received opinion touching Cerem: p: 10. T: C: his judgment of significant Ceremonies was ever, that they were unlawful. p: 11. That Tenet of inconveniency without unlawfulness, is unsound, and uncomfortable p: 12.13
Thefirst rise of Ceremonyes p: 8. Ceremonyes refused by the waldenses vpon the same grounde we refuse them p: 8. The Bishop and the Rejoy: joyne with the Lutherans in mayntayning of images p: 9. The protestants most receaved opinion touching Cerem: p: 10. T: C: his judgment of significant Ceremonies was ever, that they were vnlawfull. p: 11. That Tenet of inconveniency without vnlawfulnes, is vnsound, and vncomfortable p: 12.13
Chap. 3.
Our Cerem: are mere fopperies by the judgment of our best Divines p: 16.17. Ceremonies are nocent and hurtful as now used: pag: 18. ⟨image 59⟩Opposition against Ceremonies is no cause of the mischief they bring. p: 19.