A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Chap. 3.

Our Cerem: are mere fopperies by the judgment of our best Divines p: 16.17. Ceremonies are nocent and hurtful as now used: pag: 18. ⟨image 59⟩Opposition against Ceremonies is no cause of the mischief they bring. p: 19.

Our Cerem: are mere fopperyes by the judgment of our best Divines p: 16.17. Ceremonies are nocent and hurtfull as now used: pag: 18. ⟨image 59⟩Opposition against Ceremonies is no cause of the mischeif they bring. p: 19.

Chap. 4.

The vanity of the definition of a Cerem: discovered in the General: p: 22. Four things to be considered to make us conceive aright of a Cerem: p: 23. Things may be Ceremonies when they are not actually used, as a Surplice when it is not worn: p: 25▪ The contradiction of the Rej. in making a Cerem: an external action, and requiring a purposed observation notwithstanding in the use thereof. p: 26. Institution and purposed observation are not all one. pag: 26.27. An observation of an outward action, with a special aim or reference intended by the doer, is not required, to make up the nature of a Ceremony p: 27.28. The proper form of a Cerem: expressed in the definition, is fully discussed and found false: p: 29. How many wyes reference may be taken p: 30.31. That reference to another, not as a cause or part of it to which it doth refer, cannot be the proper nature of a Cerem: p: 32.33. The true difference between substantial and Cerem: worship, p: 35.36. A thing may be a Cerem: being referred to that whereof it is a cause. p. 37. The 7. Consectary of the Rej: examined by the