A19142:215
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Chap. 5.
The 2. partition confuted as imperfect and false: pag. 54.55. The definition of a sacred Cerem: opened p. 57.58. Confuted p: 59.60.61. The third partition of properly and reductively sacred is examined, and the vanity thereof declared p. 63.64. The 4. partition handled: p. 65.66.
The 2. partition confuted as imperfect and false: pag. 54.55. The definition of a sacred Cerem: opened p. 57.58. Confuted p: 59.60.61. The third partition of properly and reductively sacred is examined, and the vanity therof declared p. 63.64. The 4. partition handled: p. 65.66.
Chap. 6.
How we join with Papists in giving propriety of worship to Cerem: p. 67.68. How we make them necessary as they laying aside merit: p. 68.69. The Papists do not hold it sin, to omit Ceremonies: without scandal and contempt. 69.70. ⟨image 60⟩The sum of our Agreement p. 73. That our Prelates, make our Cerem: morally efficacy ous in the way of worship. Reasons of that 4 p: 75.76.