A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

¹An outward action may be designed or referred to another thing very many ways: now the Rej. taking in to his definition, reference to another thing in general, and excepting nothing but causes, and parts, he maketh all other references as they are found in outward actions Cerem: D. B. wrote this his Rej. in Reference to the Church of England, his Diocesan, and other ministers, and people, as also in reference to the Replyer, neither is his book any proper cause, or part of these, shall we say therefore that his book is a Cerem. of all these? In reference to Dr. B. many tailors, shoemakers, bookbinders, Apothecaries, Chirurgeons, Sextons, Paritors, Church-wardens (and who not?) have performed many actions, which yet were never esteemed his Cerem. The Bishops corrupt and cruel dealing in troubling of many congregations, and depriving many better then themselves, ⟨p. 23⟩have reference to the Ceremonies, but are no proper cause nor part of them? are they therefore the Cerem: of Ceremonies? To prosecute the wildness of the definition, was too tedious a chase: but yet we must consider how he explaineth the terms of it: remembering always, that this explication is a Cerem: to that definition, and is no proper cause nor part of it.

¹An outward action may be designed or referred to another thing very many wayes: now the Rej. taking in to his definition, reference to another thing in generall, and excepting nothing but causes, and parts, he maketh all other references as they are found in outward actions Cerem: D. B. wrote this his Rej. in Reference to the Church of England, his Diocesan, and other ministers, and people, as also in reference to the Replyer, neither is his book any proper cause, or part of these, shall we say therfore that his book is a Cerem. of all these? In reference to Dr. B. many taylors, shoomakers, bookbynders, Apothecaryes, Chyrurgions, Sextons, Paritors, Church-wardens (and who not?) have performed many actions, which yet were never esteemed his Cerem. The Bishops corrupt and cruell dealing in troubling of many congregations, and depriving many better then themselves, ⟨p. 23⟩have reference to the Ceremonies, but are no proper cause nor part of them? are they therfore the Cerem: of Ceremonies? To prosecute the wyldnes of the definition, was too taedious a chase: but yet we must consider how he explaineth the termes of it: remembring alwayes, that this explication is a Cerem: to that definition, and is no proper cause nor part of it.